I'll preface this by saying I've been kind of bored with modern stuff recently. Brady stuff is way too expensive, all the Pats guys I buy end up gone the next year and everyone else's prices fluctuate so much it gets annoying. So I started buying/selling old stuff, specifically T206s. I listed 4 yesterday, and almost immediately got this "question":
Your figures on the Pop report and completely false and misleading and your listings can be viewed as fabrications and removed from Ebay.
I had no idea what he meant, as I had copy and pasted exactly what the pop. report said into the auction, and that's what I told him in response. He says "Then you need to know how to read the Pop report and a better understanding of the T206 reporting." I pasted only the population report for my exact card because it is broken down by the backs, which apparently is a new feature. So there have most likely been a lot them graded higher than mine, but they aren't reported in the specific back breakdown that I used. Fine. I tell the guy sorry, I didn't understand it and it has been changed, and not to take it personally. I figured it was over, but he replies with "And the "true" vintage card experts would appreciate it you'd get your facts straight! Then me and the hundreds of others who have a right to be concerned and are concerned about hobby accuracy, won't take it "personally"."
It probably won't sound like much to most of you, but I just can't believe that this guy wouldn't just say "It's OK, now you know."
end rant
Your figures on the Pop report and completely false and misleading and your listings can be viewed as fabrications and removed from Ebay.
I had no idea what he meant, as I had copy and pasted exactly what the pop. report said into the auction, and that's what I told him in response. He says "Then you need to know how to read the Pop report and a better understanding of the T206 reporting." I pasted only the population report for my exact card because it is broken down by the backs, which apparently is a new feature. So there have most likely been a lot them graded higher than mine, but they aren't reported in the specific back breakdown that I used. Fine. I tell the guy sorry, I didn't understand it and it has been changed, and not to take it personally. I figured it was over, but he replies with "And the "true" vintage card experts would appreciate it you'd get your facts straight! Then me and the hundreds of others who have a right to be concerned and are concerned about hobby accuracy, won't take it "personally"."
It probably won't sound like much to most of you, but I just can't believe that this guy wouldn't just say "It's OK, now you know."
end rant
